Due to the
fact that a vast majority of short films are produced and distributed by small
and independent companies with much smaller budgets than those in, for example,
Hollywood, recent technological advances have had a great and positive impact
on the industry. The existence of cheaper, yet still high-quality cameras such
as the Canon 6D means that short films won’t require a large budget to cover
expenses of cameras. The Canon 6D was even used to film Black Swan and an
episode of House.
Filming,
editing and exhibition can all now be done digitally thanks to a shift away
from non-linear editing methods, and Avatar leading to all cinemas finally
going digital in 2009. This now means that filmmakers working on lower budgets,
so primarily those working on short films, can now spend less but get the same
results at Hollywood. Also, as The Guardian summarised in an article published
in March 2017, audience’s tastes are changing and now they want more freedom to
consume films how they want- such as downloading and streaming online. Sites such
as YouTube, Short of the Week and Vimeo provide this for audiences and short
films can exhibit their films essentially for free (or for a small fee on Short
of the Week, but there’s a chance it could be recognised by a well-known
director, production company etc), meaning it’s not much easier for them to get
their films out into the world.
From the
late 1990s-2005 the internet was invented, and more and more people all around
the world began having home internet access. This enabled distributors to use
the internet to target their audience, especially helping short films as their
distribution companies don’t quite have the necessary high budgets in order to
distribute in cinemas and posters globally.
A solid overview
ReplyDelete